<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Geometry &#8211; Day 61 &#8211; Circles, Sectors, Segments, and Annuli	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2007/geometry-day-61-circles-sectors-segments-and-annuli/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2007/geometry-day-61-circles-sectors-segments-and-annuli/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2007/geometry-day-61-circles-sectors-segments-and-annuli/#comment-1185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=165#comment-1185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nope, no sarcasm at all.  I just get twisted up on the difference sometimes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, no sarcasm at all.  I just get twisted up on the difference sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: e		</title>
		<link>/2007/geometry-day-61-circles-sectors-segments-and-annuli/#comment-1184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=165#comment-1184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I note a hint of sarcasm in your response. I&#039;ve noticed before that you seem bit defensive about these lessons. Somebody said that they could understand it since you clearly put a lot of work into them. I agreed,  but also thought that since you are so concerned with teaching that you would also be concerned with what you teach.  Does it seem like a petty peave to you, this issue of translation vs transformation? 

How do you respond to a student who says &quot;I just can&#039;t seem to get this translation/transformation thing right&quot;? Do you say &quot;Oh, well, it&#039;s ok, no worries&quot;? Or is it not ok?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note a hint of sarcasm in your response. I&#8217;ve noticed before that you seem bit defensive about these lessons. Somebody said that they could understand it since you clearly put a lot of work into them. I agreed,  but also thought that since you are so concerned with teaching that you would also be concerned with what you teach.  Does it seem like a petty peave to you, this issue of translation vs transformation? </p>
<p>How do you respond to a student who says &#8220;I just can&#8217;t seem to get this translation/transformation thing right&#8221;? Do you say &#8220;Oh, well, it&#8217;s ok, no worries&#8221;? Or is it not ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2007/geometry-day-61-circles-sectors-segments-and-annuli/#comment-1181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=165#comment-1181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, and no one&#039;s outed themselves as r/g colorblind, but, playing the odds, I should probably work on my color selection.  Crud.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and no one&#8217;s outed themselves as r/g colorblind, but, playing the odds, I should probably work on my color selection.  Crud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2007/geometry-day-61-circles-sectors-segments-and-annuli/#comment-1180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=165#comment-1180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;E&lt;/strong&gt;, I just can&#039;t seem to get this translation/transformation thing right.

&lt;strong&gt;Mr. C&lt;/strong&gt;, Yeah, yeah, I&#039;m &lt;em&gt;such&lt;/em&gt; a fan of limits, both in mathematics and as a logical exercise.  I wish I could think of more &lt;em&gt;gentle&lt;/em&gt; ways to introduce them.  Especially, I would love to derive area of a circle by sending the # of sides of a regular polygon to infinity.  I&#039;d lose half the class inside the first slide, but it might be worth it for the sake of the second half.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>E</strong>, I just can&#8217;t seem to get this translation/transformation thing right.</p>
<p><strong>Mr. C</strong>, Yeah, yeah, I&#8217;m <em>such</em> a fan of limits, both in mathematics and as a logical exercise.  I wish I could think of more <em>gentle</em> ways to introduce them.  Especially, I would love to derive area of a circle by sending the # of sides of a regular polygon to infinity.  I&#8217;d lose half the class inside the first slide, but it might be worth it for the sake of the second half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mrc		</title>
		<link>/2007/geometry-day-61-circles-sectors-segments-and-annuli/#comment-1178</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=165#comment-1178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First -- Love the circle area dissection.  It hints at limits, which is nice.  I feel like I just saw this demo for the first time very recently, maybe in the NCTM newsletter?

Also, do you have issues with red/green colorblind kids doing your opener?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8212; Love the circle area dissection.  It hints at limits, which is nice.  I feel like I just saw this demo for the first time very recently, maybe in the NCTM newsletter?</p>
<p>Also, do you have issues with red/green colorblind kids doing your opener?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: e		</title>
		<link>/2007/geometry-day-61-circles-sectors-segments-and-annuli/#comment-1177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=165#comment-1177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the opener: a) is a reflection. b) could be translation, and it could be a reflection, or it could be translation followed by rotation (many of them), or it could be reflection followed by rotation, or......
&lt;i&gt;More realistic name&lt;/i&gt;: usually people refer to a torus as a doughnut. Both are rather questionable. Torus is two dimensional (surface), annulus is one dimensional, doughnut is 3 dimensional.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the opener: a) is a reflection. b) could be translation, and it could be a reflection, or it could be translation followed by rotation (many of them), or it could be reflection followed by rotation, or&#8230;&#8230;<br />
<i>More realistic name</i>: usually people refer to a torus as a doughnut. Both are rather questionable. Torus is two dimensional (surface), annulus is one dimensional, doughnut is 3 dimensional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
