<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Challenge of Writing in a Digital Age	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2007/the-challenge-of-writing-in-a-digital-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2007/the-challenge-of-writing-in-a-digital-age/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2007/the-challenge-of-writing-in-a-digital-age/#comment-28202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=445#comment-28202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Laurie,

Out of John August&#039;s points, I found Immediacy and Permanence the most confounding.  Thanks for commiserating on that one, and adding a bit to the picture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Laurie,</p>
<p>Out of John August&#8217;s points, I found Immediacy and Permanence the most confounding.  Thanks for commiserating on that one, and adding a bit to the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Laurie		</title>
		<link>/2007/the-challenge-of-writing-in-a-digital-age/#comment-28117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=445#comment-28117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[August lists the following:

Authority 
Immediacy 
Permanence 
Response 

As a new blogger, and long-time teacher, I find myself asking if the ideas of immediacy and permanence aren&#039;t contradictory in this new (relatively speaking) world of email, blogging, etc. Then I consider the more traditional &quot;book&quot; writing and realize that really the only terms above that apply are authority (in some cases) and permanence, and that the ideas of immediacy and response have become so beneficial in the electronic world of writing. I don&#039;t really know where this is leading -- just thoughts as I consider the value of various written forms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>August lists the following:</p>
<p>Authority<br />
Immediacy<br />
Permanence<br />
Response </p>
<p>As a new blogger, and long-time teacher, I find myself asking if the ideas of immediacy and permanence aren&#8217;t contradictory in this new (relatively speaking) world of email, blogging, etc. Then I consider the more traditional &#8220;book&#8221; writing and realize that really the only terms above that apply are authority (in some cases) and permanence, and that the ideas of immediacy and response have become so beneficial in the electronic world of writing. I don&#8217;t really know where this is leading &#8212; just thoughts as I consider the value of various written forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>/2007/the-challenge-of-writing-in-a-digital-age/#comment-27969</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=445#comment-27969</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My expert opinion:  no, wait, do I mean my opinion as an authority on the topic?

What&#039;s the topic?  

Oh, so my writing is being judged?  By authorities?  By experts?

I will take you back now, to the University of Hartford, Fall 1989  Final Exam, Freshman Composition.  Prof. DenOuden.  Here is the only comment she wrote on my final exam (and yes, I&#039;ve committed this to memory):

&quot;If you continue to write about yourself, you will never learn anything about the world or the people in it.&quot;

Can anyone get away with that sentiment today?  Wouldn&#039;t it be a kick in the &#039;ole internet if she turned out to be the proud owner of a blog?

I don&#039;t think there is a distinction that can be made, but I know the following:

1.  Put a question mark at the end of your last prompt and you have yourself a beautiful essential question!
2.  You&#039;re about to get slammed with a lot of experts and authorities weighing in on this.  

You&#039;re a sneaky dog...dawg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My expert opinion:  no, wait, do I mean my opinion as an authority on the topic?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the topic?  </p>
<p>Oh, so my writing is being judged?  By authorities?  By experts?</p>
<p>I will take you back now, to the University of Hartford, Fall 1989  Final Exam, Freshman Composition.  Prof. DenOuden.  Here is the only comment she wrote on my final exam (and yes, I&#8217;ve committed this to memory):</p>
<p>&#8220;If you continue to write about yourself, you will never learn anything about the world or the people in it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can anyone get away with that sentiment today?  Wouldn&#8217;t it be a kick in the &#8216;ole internet if she turned out to be the proud owner of a blog?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there is a distinction that can be made, but I know the following:</p>
<p>1.  Put a question mark at the end of your last prompt and you have yourself a beautiful essential question!<br />
2.  You&#8217;re about to get slammed with a lot of experts and authorities weighing in on this.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re a sneaky dog&#8230;dawg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
