<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Overdue	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2008/overdue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2008/overdue/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:22:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-140885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-140885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t wait.  Thanks for stopping by.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait.  Thanks for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jessica		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-140221</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-140221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s the classic thinker-feeler scale on the Meyers-Briggs personality test.  Everyone falls on one side of the spectrum or the other.  Some, myself included (and from what I read on this blog you too), fall farther to one extreme than the other.  I am an extreme thinker and often hurt other people simply because I don&#039;t realize that they are so &quot;feely&quot; about things and don&#039;t understand that I sometimes need to adjust my presentation of ideas to sidestep hurtful touchy-feely moments.  However, it is a balance.  Sometimes us thinkers need to be reminded about people and feelings and sometimes those feelers need to toughen up and push through their emotions to get the job done.  

On a completely unrelated note...I love the blog.  I started blogging over a year ago out of desperation in dealing with some terrible management and discipline problems that I had never faced before.  Since then I&#039;ve been wishy washy about blogging but recently decided to return with purpose as I&#039;m looking at starting a PhD program in C&#038;I with an emphasis in PD and Teacher Ed.  Research in that field somehow landed me hear and I&#039;ve read every post from beginning to end.  You&#039;ve got some great stuff going on here.  Thanks for sharing.  I&#039;ll be posting lessons and joining more in the conversations come Fall!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the classic thinker-feeler scale on the Meyers-Briggs personality test.  Everyone falls on one side of the spectrum or the other.  Some, myself included (and from what I read on this blog you too), fall farther to one extreme than the other.  I am an extreme thinker and often hurt other people simply because I don&#8217;t realize that they are so &#8220;feely&#8221; about things and don&#8217;t understand that I sometimes need to adjust my presentation of ideas to sidestep hurtful touchy-feely moments.  However, it is a balance.  Sometimes us thinkers need to be reminded about people and feelings and sometimes those feelers need to toughen up and push through their emotions to get the job done.  </p>
<p>On a completely unrelated note&#8230;I love the blog.  I started blogging over a year ago out of desperation in dealing with some terrible management and discipline problems that I had never faced before.  Since then I&#8217;ve been wishy washy about blogging but recently decided to return with purpose as I&#8217;m looking at starting a PhD program in C&amp;I with an emphasis in PD and Teacher Ed.  Research in that field somehow landed me hear and I&#8217;ve read every post from beginning to end.  You&#8217;ve got some great stuff going on here.  Thanks for sharing.  I&#8217;ll be posting lessons and joining more in the conversations come Fall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-79876</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-79876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So proud.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A. Mercer		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-79871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Mercer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-79871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Look Dan, a fight, and you didn&#039;t even start it! I love this place.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look Dan, a fight, and you didn&#8217;t even start it! I love this place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Rock		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-79781</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-79781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What was &quot;offensive&quot; about my comment? Was it the use of the phrase &quot;knocked up&quot;? Should I just say &quot;pregnant&quot; next time?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was &#8220;offensive&#8221; about my comment? Was it the use of the phrase &#8220;knocked up&#8221;? Should I just say &#8220;pregnant&#8221; next time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Hoefler		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-79675</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Hoefler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-79675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know Peter ... I find little help in being intentionally offensive.  The medium (blog posts/comments) can so easily backfire in the realm of intention and emotion that there&#039;s little need to push those boundaries.  So, I guess if all you really want is to snarl back, then that&#039;s fine.  But if the goal really is to challenge ideas, sift and sort and find the best ones, then I&#039;m going to clap loudly for Dan&#039;s open decision to pay more attention to &quot;how&quot; his ideas are received (because he&#039;s had a clear handle on the &quot;what&quot; for quite a while).

It&#039;s a shame to see good ideas disregarded for a controllable factor like tone.

On the other side, Dan, watching tone so as not to be an intentional ass is different than becoming a mealy-mouthed pushover ... but I have little fear that you&#039;ll swing too far in the other direction.  ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Peter &#8230; I find little help in being intentionally offensive.  The medium (blog posts/comments) can so easily backfire in the realm of intention and emotion that there&#8217;s little need to push those boundaries.  So, I guess if all you really want is to snarl back, then that&#8217;s fine.  But if the goal really is to challenge ideas, sift and sort and find the best ones, then I&#8217;m going to clap loudly for Dan&#8217;s open decision to pay more attention to &#8220;how&#8221; his ideas are received (because he&#8217;s had a clear handle on the &#8220;what&#8221; for quite a while).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame to see good ideas disregarded for a controllable factor like tone.</p>
<p>On the other side, Dan, watching tone so as not to be an intentional ass is different than becoming a mealy-mouthed pushover &#8230; but I have little fear that you&#8217;ll swing too far in the other direction.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Rock		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-79589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-79589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recently challenged the idea that to be Christian means to be anti-abortion. I asked a twitterer, &quot;If Jesus knocked up his girlfriend and she wanted to get an abortion, would he support her?&quot;

That person no longer follows me on Twitter and kicked me off of following their private updates. 1 minute before that I was being praised for asking a &quot;good&quot; question (If Jesus was on twitter, how many followers would he have?) by the same person.

Abrasive? Confrontational? Perhaps. But I certainly wouldn&#039;t think twice about asking that question again.

I take an amazingly (and genuinely) polite tone when people I disagree with are open to dialog with me. When they are not (or act like they are) and I feel their ideas are bogus, the confrontational and abrasive side of me doesn&#039;t hesitate to come out and play.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently challenged the idea that to be Christian means to be anti-abortion. I asked a twitterer, &#8220;If Jesus knocked up his girlfriend and she wanted to get an abortion, would he support her?&#8221;</p>
<p>That person no longer follows me on Twitter and kicked me off of following their private updates. 1 minute before that I was being praised for asking a &#8220;good&#8221; question (If Jesus was on twitter, how many followers would he have?) by the same person.</p>
<p>Abrasive? Confrontational? Perhaps. But I certainly wouldn&#8217;t think twice about asking that question again.</p>
<p>I take an amazingly (and genuinely) polite tone when people I disagree with are open to dialog with me. When they are not (or act like they are) and I feel their ideas are bogus, the confrontational and abrasive side of me doesn&#8217;t hesitate to come out and play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Graham Wegner		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-79575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham Wegner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-79575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d agree with Peter on this one - challenge the idea, not the person. Of course, there are some people who are so wrapped up in their ideas that a challenge on their idea is viewed as a personal affront. I still say that seeing it&#039;s your blog, you set the tone and the ground rules.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree with Peter on this one &#8211; challenge the idea, not the person. Of course, there are some people who are so wrapped up in their ideas that a challenge on their idea is viewed as a personal affront. I still say that seeing it&#8217;s your blog, you set the tone and the ground rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Rock		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-79565</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-79565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see anything necessarily wrong with being confrontational or abrasive. If another&#039;s idea deserves a challenge then it deserves a challenge. Like Mr. K, I&#039;d caution you against pulling back too much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see anything necessarily wrong with being confrontational or abrasive. If another&#8217;s idea deserves a challenge then it deserves a challenge. Like Mr. K, I&#8217;d caution you against pulling back too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A. Mercer		</title>
		<link>/2008/overdue/#comment-79514</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Mercer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=739#comment-79514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dan, I still read, and I still will read you. I suggested you watch the snark factor earlier on (Fall I believe). There are two things that have continued to make you okay in my book:

1. You are willing to be as ruthless (if not more) on what you are doing (esp. in the classroom) as you are on others;

2. The roots of your comments are in trying to keep it real;

3. Most importantly, you&#039;re willing to admit you might have gone too far.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I still read, and I still will read you. I suggested you watch the snark factor earlier on (Fall I believe). There are two things that have continued to make you okay in my book:</p>
<p>1. You are willing to be as ruthless (if not more) on what you are doing (esp. in the classroom) as you are on others;</p>
<p>2. The roots of your comments are in trying to keep it real;</p>
<p>3. Most importantly, you&#8217;re willing to admit you might have gone too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
