<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Peer Editing In Math	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2008/peer-editing-in-math/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2008/peer-editing-in-math/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Todd		</title>
		<link>/2008/peer-editing-in-math/#comment-95740</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=791#comment-95740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tell me about it. I haven&#039;t had much free time due to all this (hence the low blog output) and there&#039;s a new batch of essays to go through before the final writing piece comes in next month.

Pulling examples is a huge time sink. Not only in deciding which ones to put in front of the students&#039; eyes, but also in formatting (gigantic concern), copying, designing a clear way to get the task done (use different fonts for each sample). Hopefully well worth it, though.

I find it easier to simply pick one period to pull all samples from. It&#039;s too overwhelming otherwise. &quot;All of these samples today come from sixth period. I&#039;ll pull samples from your writing next time.&quot; Just wait till you get to sixth period &#039;cause they&#039;re all crazed about whose writing they are looking at. And be sure you pick fairly middle of the road samples, nothing from the 90-100% pile and nothing from the 50% pile. Pull from the 70-80% pile and you&#039;ll be glad you did. Students will, too, because that writing is easier to imitate and seems within reach, quite often.

Thanks for the repost, Dan. I&#039;ll put all these ideas and more into my follow up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me about it. I haven&#8217;t had much free time due to all this (hence the low blog output) and there&#8217;s a new batch of essays to go through before the final writing piece comes in next month.</p>
<p>Pulling examples is a huge time sink. Not only in deciding which ones to put in front of the students&#8217; eyes, but also in formatting (gigantic concern), copying, designing a clear way to get the task done (use different fonts for each sample). Hopefully well worth it, though.</p>
<p>I find it easier to simply pick one period to pull all samples from. It&#8217;s too overwhelming otherwise. &#8220;All of these samples today come from sixth period. I&#8217;ll pull samples from your writing next time.&#8221; Just wait till you get to sixth period &#8217;cause they&#8217;re all crazed about whose writing they are looking at. And be sure you pick fairly middle of the road samples, nothing from the 90-100% pile and nothing from the 50% pile. Pull from the 70-80% pile and you&#8217;ll be glad you did. Students will, too, because that writing is easier to imitate and seems within reach, quite often.</p>
<p>Thanks for the repost, Dan. I&#8217;ll put all these ideas and more into my follow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Larkin		</title>
		<link>/2008/peer-editing-in-math/#comment-95598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Larkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=791#comment-95598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dan,
Nice pointer. Shall implement this technique this week.
Cheers,
John]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
Nice pointer. Shall implement this technique this week.<br />
Cheers,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
