<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Unexamined Idolatry	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2008/unexamined-idolatry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2008/unexamined-idolatry/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TheInfamousJ		</title>
		<link>/2008/unexamined-idolatry/#comment-52924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheInfamousJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=612#comment-52924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recently downgraded the use of technology in my classroom which resulted in increased student involvement in the lessons. The reason I did this is that I share a data projector with the next-door teacher and I think she&#039;s better at bearing her fangs and growling than I am.

For her, the means of the presentation is the whole shebang. For me, I can teach just as well with an overhead or some colorful chalk and my board.

And wouldn&#039;t you know it, I get more student buy-in this way. When I don&#039;t readily have a visual but ask my students to go up to the board and work it out, they no longer sit like passive lumps.

-------------------------------------

All that said, I think that even with focus on design -
 (by the way, all my worksheets and lab procedures use the same design now and the students are much better at putting their names on their papers)
- I still think that good design does is a poor sub for lack of content. And I believe that students are incredibly tolerant of design, when the content is engaging.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently downgraded the use of technology in my classroom which resulted in increased student involvement in the lessons. The reason I did this is that I share a data projector with the next-door teacher and I think she&#8217;s better at bearing her fangs and growling than I am.</p>
<p>For her, the means of the presentation is the whole shebang. For me, I can teach just as well with an overhead or some colorful chalk and my board.</p>
<p>And wouldn&#8217;t you know it, I get more student buy-in this way. When I don&#8217;t readily have a visual but ask my students to go up to the board and work it out, they no longer sit like passive lumps.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>All that said, I think that even with focus on design &#8211;<br />
 (by the way, all my worksheets and lab procedures use the same design now and the students are much better at putting their names on their papers)<br />
&#8211; I still think that good design does is a poor sub for lack of content. And I believe that students are incredibly tolerant of design, when the content is engaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dina		</title>
		<link>/2008/unexamined-idolatry/#comment-52472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=612#comment-52472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aw, Dan, the poster child thing wasn&#039;t a shot at you-- much more at myself. No apologies required. I think we&#039;re on the same page. And I am grateful to be hashing my thoughts out with good minds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, Dan, the poster child thing wasn&#8217;t a shot at you&#8211; much more at myself. No apologies required. I think we&#8217;re on the same page. And I am grateful to be hashing my thoughts out with good minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2008/unexamined-idolatry/#comment-52455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=612#comment-52455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Right.  Sorry if I&#039;ve associated the two of you too closely with my personal causes.

What I appreciate about the four parties loosely sucked into this thing (me, the two of you, and Scott) is that each seems to take the burden fully upon his- or herself to not bore kids.  Which is great.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  Sorry if I&#8217;ve associated the two of you too closely with my personal causes.</p>
<p>What I appreciate about the four parties loosely sucked into this thing (me, the two of you, and Scott) is that each seems to take the burden fully upon his- or herself to not bore kids.  Which is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dina		</title>
		<link>/2008/unexamined-idolatry/#comment-52452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=612#comment-52452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just hold still and be the poster child for frustration with technology, Jeff. This won&#039;t hurt a bit. 

Also don&#039;t want to mischaracterize myself here, either-- I&#039;m still learning a lot of the techs I listed. This is one of the reasons tech currently makes very limited appearances in my classroom, but there are others. Extremely circumscribed support is one reason, as Jeff notes. A fervent desire to think about my computer, and how it affects my and my kids&#039; very WAY OF BEING, is another. I&#039;ve blogged pretty extensively on this recently. 

I also think that there&#039;s something to be said for subject-specific applications of technology. Let&#039;s take &quot;the juicy detail&quot; of good writing, which often comes out of strong sensory awareness. Witness Dan&#039;s last post on the blogger anecdote. 

Do I therefore want to take the majority of my instructional time to work on Voicethread (and in the process extend the time their senses are stripped down to two out of five), or take kids outside and brainstorm adjectives that describe how the trees sound when snow falls off their branches? Which will result in the best learning outcomes for this group of kids-- in ENGLISH class? Where are their foundations best laid? Where is the balance?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just hold still and be the poster child for frustration with technology, Jeff. This won&#8217;t hurt a bit. </p>
<p>Also don&#8217;t want to mischaracterize myself here, either&#8211; I&#8217;m still learning a lot of the techs I listed. This is one of the reasons tech currently makes very limited appearances in my classroom, but there are others. Extremely circumscribed support is one reason, as Jeff notes. A fervent desire to think about my computer, and how it affects my and my kids&#8217; very WAY OF BEING, is another. I&#8217;ve blogged pretty extensively on this recently. </p>
<p>I also think that there&#8217;s something to be said for subject-specific applications of technology. Let&#8217;s take &#8220;the juicy detail&#8221; of good writing, which often comes out of strong sensory awareness. Witness Dan&#8217;s last post on the blogger anecdote. </p>
<p>Do I therefore want to take the majority of my instructional time to work on Voicethread (and in the process extend the time their senses are stripped down to two out of five), or take kids outside and brainstorm adjectives that describe how the trees sound when snow falls off their branches? Which will result in the best learning outcomes for this group of kids&#8211; in ENGLISH class? Where are their foundations best laid? Where is the balance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>/2008/unexamined-idolatry/#comment-52377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=612#comment-52377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[long live poster-board!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>long live poster-board!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff		</title>
		<link>/2008/unexamined-idolatry/#comment-52342</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=612#comment-52342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s not entirely mischaracterize this...I&#039;m not withdrawing &quot;tech from [my] classroom&quot;--still running the iPod, still bitching when the classroom&#039;s one computer is in the shop for a week.  Just not fighting for lab space for something that doesn&#039;t seem as important as it once did.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not entirely mischaracterize this&#8230;I&#8217;m not withdrawing &#8220;tech from [my] classroom&#8221;&#8211;still running the iPod, still bitching when the classroom&#8217;s one computer is in the shop for a week.  Just not fighting for lab space for something that doesn&#8217;t seem as important as it once did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
