<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why I Don&#8217;t Use Your Textbook	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dy/dan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Lesson Plan: The Door Lock		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-238594</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dy/dan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Lesson Plan: The Door Lock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-238594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] long. Tell them the code is 2 digits long. Tell them it&#039;s as long you want it to be. I respected the rule of least power here, which meant that when I took this photo I tried to stay out of the way of your lesson [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] long. Tell them the code is 2 digits long. Tell them it&#8217;s as long you want it to be. I respected the rule of least power here, which meant that when I took this photo I tried to stay out of the way of your lesson [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-200217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-200217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Kevin&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for the commentary, and for the reference to Art of Problem Solving. It&#039;s at the top of an (admittedly pretty stagnant) to-read list.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kevin</strong>, thanks for the commentary, and for the reference to Art of Problem Solving. It&#8217;s at the top of an (admittedly pretty stagnant) to-read list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-200216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-200216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Texts are very useful for those kids who are fast readers and get content better from reading than from listing to teachers or watching videos.  I know that I often have little patience for the droning of lecturers telling me stuff I picked up in the first 5 minutes of the talk by reading the paper.  My son also would rather read a book on a subject than sit through a dull class.  Of course, many kids are not good enough at &quot;reading to learn&quot; for their text books to serve as much more than backpack weights.

That said, I rarely follow a text when I teach (mostly grad classes), because the material I teach has not been put into good books.  I do provide reading assignments for those who would prefer to get the material that way.

For math, the key learning happens by solving problems using the methods.  A text is great for providing a source of well-crafted problems of graduated difficulty (now, if only the math text writers actually did that!).  At the elementary-school level, the Singapore Primary Math series actually does an excellent job of providing that sort of graduated exercise, as well as supplementary books with intensive practice and challenging problems, for those who need more.  At the high-school level, the Art of Problem-Solving texts have some of the best problem sets I&#039;ve seen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texts are very useful for those kids who are fast readers and get content better from reading than from listing to teachers or watching videos.  I know that I often have little patience for the droning of lecturers telling me stuff I picked up in the first 5 minutes of the talk by reading the paper.  My son also would rather read a book on a subject than sit through a dull class.  Of course, many kids are not good enough at &#8220;reading to learn&#8221; for their text books to serve as much more than backpack weights.</p>
<p>That said, I rarely follow a text when I teach (mostly grad classes), because the material I teach has not been put into good books.  I do provide reading assignments for those who would prefer to get the material that way.</p>
<p>For math, the key learning happens by solving problems using the methods.  A text is great for providing a source of well-crafted problems of graduated difficulty (now, if only the math text writers actually did that!).  At the elementary-school level, the Singapore Primary Math series actually does an excellent job of providing that sort of graduated exercise, as well as supplementary books with intensive practice and challenging problems, for those who need more.  At the high-school level, the Art of Problem-Solving texts have some of the best problem sets I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-195022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-195022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Dan, re: a textbook I&#039;d &quot;cherish:&quot;

I&#039;ve mulled this over for awhile, and I think the only type of textbook that I&#039;d &quot;cling to&quot; or &quot;cherish&quot; would be a text that I&#039;d written- and that would probably only be because of the royalties.

I guess I just can&#039;t envision a single text that would be appropriate to use every day for an entire semester.  I&#039;m thinking more of science texts (my speciality) here, where generally the questions and problems in the book are simply insufficient to get at the real meat of the content.

If I was &lt;strike&gt;forced&lt;/strike&gt; hired to &lt;em&gt;write&lt;/em&gt; a high school science textbook, it would be written in simple English, rely heavily on analogies, include only basic overviews of the content, and have a hefty list of resources (websites, non-fiction books, videos, etc.) for each section for when you need to go into more detail. 

However, I don&#039;t what I&#039;ve described is best suited by a physical textbook. It sounds much more like an online document.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan, re: a textbook I&#8217;d &#8220;cherish:&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve mulled this over for awhile, and I think the only type of textbook that I&#8217;d &#8220;cling to&#8221; or &#8220;cherish&#8221; would be a text that I&#8217;d written- and that would probably only be because of the royalties.</p>
<p>I guess I just can&#8217;t envision a single text that would be appropriate to use every day for an entire semester.  I&#8217;m thinking more of science texts (my speciality) here, where generally the questions and problems in the book are simply insufficient to get at the real meat of the content.</p>
<p>If I was <strike>forced</strike> hired to <em>write</em> a high school science textbook, it would be written in simple English, rely heavily on analogies, include only basic overviews of the content, and have a hefty list of resources (websites, non-fiction books, videos, etc.) for each section for when you need to go into more detail. </p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t what I&#8217;ve described is best suited by a physical textbook. It sounds much more like an online document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ava Erickson		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-194978</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ava Erickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-194978</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dan, I&#039;m with you about the cost and waste of textbooks.  I was encouraged when NCTM released their report recommending smaller, more focused text books.  I myself piece together curriculum from different texts and stuff I&#039;ve made up myself.  But I&#039;d love a small text of practice problems.  Ava.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I&#8217;m with you about the cost and waste of textbooks.  I was encouraged when NCTM released their report recommending smaller, more focused text books.  I myself piece together curriculum from different texts and stuff I&#8217;ve made up myself.  But I&#8217;d love a small text of practice problems.  Ava.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Not a textbook, but just as bad&#8230; &#171; Mr. Teach		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-194452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not a textbook, but just as bad&#8230; &#171; Mr. Teach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-194452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] just as&#160;bad&#8230;  Posted on December 2, 2008 by mrteachus   My school doesn&#8217;t use a textbook for math, so I&#8217;m not quite in the same boat as Dan.Â  Mine might be worse, it&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] just as&nbsp;bad&#8230;  Posted on December 2, 2008 by mrteachus   My school doesn&#8217;t use a textbook for math, so I&#8217;m not quite in the same boat as Dan.Â  Mine might be worse, it&#8217;s a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Fate Of Pirates: Thoughts On Teaching		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-194174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Fate Of Pirates: Thoughts On Teaching]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-194174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] been going on about this Rule of Least Power, something I&#8217;m not entirely sure I agree with (often, a Rule of Most Power seems more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] been going on about this Rule of Least Power, something I&#8217;m not entirely sure I agree with (often, a Rule of Most Power seems more [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-193723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-193723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Scott - The cycle of testing and textbook writing is nasty. Oregon just defeated a ballot measure to spend millions of dollars generating new tests to enable a new teacher performance-driven replacement to the seniority system.

@Dan - As far as a &quot;seasoned veteran&quot; textbook, I think that&#039;s a good question. Probably none of the ones sitting around, or maybe any of the books sitting around just as a bunch of bound problem sets. The bigger question of presenting the material and exploring it seems like something folks come up with on their own to avoid totally artificial, why-are-we-learning-this inducing content.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott &#8211; The cycle of testing and textbook writing is nasty. Oregon just defeated a ballot measure to spend millions of dollars generating new tests to enable a new teacher performance-driven replacement to the seniority system.</p>
<p>@Dan &#8211; As far as a &#8220;seasoned veteran&#8221; textbook, I think that&#8217;s a good question. Probably none of the ones sitting around, or maybe any of the books sitting around just as a bunch of bound problem sets. The bigger question of presenting the material and exploring it seems like something folks come up with on their own to avoid totally artificial, why-are-we-learning-this inducing content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-193703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-193703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Doug&lt;/strong&gt;, I do use it for the practice problems (though only if their difficulty is scaffolded gracefully) so perhaps I overstated my case.  It seems a terrible waste, however, to disregard 90% of a textbook that costs between $60 and $100 per student.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Doug</strong>, I do use it for the practice problems (though only if their difficulty is scaffolded gracefully) so perhaps I overstated my case.  It seems a terrible waste, however, to disregard 90% of a textbook that costs between $60 and $100 per student.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dy/dan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Rule Of Least Power: An Initial Approach		</title>
		<link>/2008/why-i-dont-use-your-textbook/#comment-193698</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dy/dan &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Rule Of Least Power: An Initial Approach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1912#comment-193698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] contrast, an application of the Rule of Least Power to the problem looks like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] contrast, an application of the Rule of Least Power to the problem looks like [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
