Year: 2009

Total 161 Posts

Digital Time Travel

Sorry if you already caught this off my tweet but these photos, like I told my students, are some of the most eerie, gorgeous media the Internet has passed my way all year.

That was my preface, but I didn’t explain myself. I asked them to tell me what was so significant about the photo.

“Because they’re hiding.”
“Because they’re on a train.”

I asked them what the relationship was between those two girls.

“Mother and daughter.”
“Sisters.”

I told them that the photo had rattled me so much because there is only one girl in that photo. Those two girls are the same person, separated by decades. The child grew into the adult who digitally inserted herself back into childhood portraits.

Whether the results constitute “musings on the contemporary relevance of the self-portrait” or, for me, a concise visual metaphor for everything that is so wonderful and horrifying about growing up, or something else entirely, I don’t know. But they’re wonderful.

[via]

Like Littler Versions Of Us!

It was the National Day of Silence today while it was the Tax Day Tea Party two days ago. As participating students filed into my classroom, I was struck by their facial expressions. Some were appropriately solemn and reflective. Others stifled smiles, their silence just an affectation, protesting for the sake of protest. There were also provocateurs, students looking to undermine anything that gave the impression of sincerity.

Mostly, I was struck by the bijection between student protesters and adult protesters. Every fringe or mainstream character you’d find at a tea party you’d also find in my sixth period classroom, only smaller and a little more obvious about their motivations.

Will Oldham: “You’re Doing Music Wrong.”

Will Oldham, musician, actor, guy-who-takes-his-craft-extremely-seriously:

People are constantly contacting me saying, โ€œIโ€™ve been editing my movie, and Iโ€™ve been using your song in the editing process. What would it take to license the song?โ€ And for me itโ€™s like, โ€œRegardless of what youโ€™ve been doing, my song doesnโ€™t belong in your movie.โ€ [emph. mine]

A good song is a fully articulated capsule of theme and story. So is a good movie. What are the odds that the songwriter’s fully articulated capsule of theme and story aligns exactly with yours? In the event that they don’t align, whose theme/story โ€“ the professional’s or the amateur’s โ€“ do you think will override the other’s?Previously: Don’t Let Your Students Use Music In Their Video Projects.

Jason Dyer’s Redesign Of My Redesign Of Darren Kuropatwa’s Design

This is great. This is the culture of criticism we need.

I don’t know if Jason has redesigned my slides (since they’re all intact) so much as he has extended them in a particularly meaningful way. We motivated the concept of range by fixing the means, telling the kids implicitly, “you can’t use that anymore.” Now, Jason inserts this slide, which fixes the mean and the range, asking the kids, “now what can you do with this?”

This approach to skill development works both with fancy visual application problems and with skill acquisition. Rather, than 1) defining some concept like “range,” and then 2) using it in example problems, we instead 1) discover the limitations of our current tools and then 2) invent new ones. These mathematical operations didn’t arise just to employ degenerates like me. They arose because we needed them.

To the extent that Jason seems to think we should skip range altogether, I disagree. (Why not talk about it?) To the extent that he thinks we should engineer a situation where range is no longer useful, where the students must develop stronger tools like variation and standard deviation, I say nice job.

Swap “Design” for “Edublogging”

Khoi Vinh is the design director for the New York Times online. He has written a tremendous piece about the state of online design criticism that mirrors my assessment of the state of online teacher criticism down to the last word:

Sometimes I wonder, then: given that everyone in design seems to more or less know everyone else, are we really having the kinds of meaningful, constructive, critical discourses that we really should be having? Are we too quick to take offense at the opinions of our peers? Or are we pulling our punches too much when discussing the merits of the work that our peers turn out? To put a finer point on it: are we being honest with one another?