<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hello, CNN.	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/hello-cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2010/hello-cnn/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hvordan lÃ¦re matematikk &#124; TankelÃ¸se plukk		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-778357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hvordan lÃ¦re matematikk &#124; TankelÃ¸se plukk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-778357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] ut hvordan de skal formulere oppgaven. Videoen er verdt 11 minutter:  Dan Meyer har ogsÃ¥ vÃ¦rt gjest hos CNN og har en blogg som er vel verdt Ã¥ lese. Blant annet om hvordan han evaluerer elevene. Jeg tror [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ut hvordan de skal formulere oppgaven. Videoen er verdt 11 minutter:  Dan Meyer har ogsÃ¥ vÃ¦rt gjest hos CNN og har en blogg som er vel verdt Ã¥ lese. Blant annet om hvordan han evaluerer elevene. Jeg tror [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Meyer		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@&lt;strong&gt;AnonProfessor&lt;/strong&gt;, solid critique there. It&#039;s like you were in my head, especially w/r/t to your second bullet point about being painfully aware of the time constraints and really not wanting to be the sort of guest who rambles on and on. It&#039;s clear to me, after watching the tape, that I ran too far in the other direction. 

@&lt;strong&gt;Margaret&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for not being scandalized. Wish I could say the same for my dear old mom and dad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<strong>AnonProfessor</strong>, solid critique there. It&#8217;s like you were in my head, especially w/r/t to your second bullet point about being painfully aware of the time constraints and really not wanting to be the sort of guest who rambles on and on. It&#8217;s clear to me, after watching the tape, that I ran too far in the other direction. </p>
<p>@<strong>Margaret</strong>, thanks for not being scandalized. Wish I could say the same for my dear old mom and dad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hvordan lÃ¦re matematikk &#171;TankelÃ¸st plukk		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hvordan lÃ¦re matematikk &#171;TankelÃ¸st plukk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 12:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Meyer har ogsÃ¥ vÃ¦rt gjest hos CNN og har en blogg som er vel verdt Ã¥ lese. Blant annet om hvordan han evaluerer elevene. Jeg tror [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Meyer har ogsÃ¥ vÃ¦rt gjest hos CNN og har en blogg som er vel verdt Ã¥ lese. Blant annet om hvordan han evaluerer elevene. Jeg tror [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Margaret		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260707</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 09:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dan, thanks for posting the video and sorry Anon Professor but I couldn&#039;t disagree more! I loved that your answers were short and to the point, so that it didn&#039;t look like you were desperately trying to &#039;beat the media&#039; in their game. You came across as honest, confident and unhurried and you delivered your message perfectly. I also loved the ex-girlfriends example! It said to me, &#039;this guy is not afraid of fun and he&#039;s willing to treat children as actual people who are not nearly as easily scandalised as we stuffy-adults.&#039; 

Thank you so much for your work and passion. Bravo to you :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, thanks for posting the video and sorry Anon Professor but I couldn&#8217;t disagree more! I loved that your answers were short and to the point, so that it didn&#8217;t look like you were desperately trying to &#8216;beat the media&#8217; in their game. You came across as honest, confident and unhurried and you delivered your message perfectly. I also loved the ex-girlfriends example! It said to me, &#8216;this guy is not afraid of fun and he&#8217;s willing to treat children as actual people who are not nearly as easily scandalised as we stuffy-adults.&#8217; </p>
<p>Thank you so much for your work and passion. Bravo to you :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AnonProfessor		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260694</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AnonProfessor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good job on the interview, Dan!  I like it.  Doing a live interview on national TV is incredibly challenging and stressful; you came out looking well, so you can pat yourself on the back.

Looking for feedback, in case you have to do this again?  I suspect the biggest thing you could do to improve and do even better, next time, is to say about twice as much.  If you re-watch the interview, you&#039;ll notice that the interviewer is really carrying a lot of the load in the interview, and you give mostly short replies that answer the question asked concisely.  Don&#039;t restrict yourself to just answering the question asked: take the opportunity to digress a little.  Conciseness is good, but instead of just a one-sentence answer, I think you could have given a two-sentence answer.  In other words, after question you got asked, I think you could have given the one- or two-sentence answer you gave, then tack on one more sentence or two with a fun anecdote.  Tell a little story, or give an example of the general point you just made, or say something about why your methods are meaningful to your kids or to you.  It&#039;s OK to use the interviewer&#039;s question as just a jumping-off point: to answer the question, then bridge/segue to some related topic that you&#039;re enthusiastic about.  You can prepare before the interview some little stories or neat examples from your class, and have a few of them ready in your head, so that you can sprinkle them into the conversation.

By the way, if it makes you feel any better, I have exactly the same shortcoming: I&#039;ve given live interviews on national TV, and I fell into the same pattern.  I think it is for a few reasons: (a) I&#039;m a geeky mathematician, and I&#039;m trained to answer exactly the question asked, as precisely as possible, which means my instinct is to avoid any digression (which is not necessarily the right instinct here), (b) I&#039;m super-aware that I have only a tiny time slot, and so I&#039;m trying to be as concise as possible, (c) I find the experience totally stressful, and I don&#039;t think or articulate well on my feet under time pressure.  I don&#039;t know whether any of that applies to you as well, but I mention in case it resonates.

Anyway, I think did a good job.  Please don&#039;t take any of this as criticism: I enjoyed your interview, and thought you came off very well!  It&#039;s great to see you get some exposure and recognition for your excellent work, and I hope it exposes more folks to the thought-provoking ideas on this blog.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job on the interview, Dan!  I like it.  Doing a live interview on national TV is incredibly challenging and stressful; you came out looking well, so you can pat yourself on the back.</p>
<p>Looking for feedback, in case you have to do this again?  I suspect the biggest thing you could do to improve and do even better, next time, is to say about twice as much.  If you re-watch the interview, you&#8217;ll notice that the interviewer is really carrying a lot of the load in the interview, and you give mostly short replies that answer the question asked concisely.  Don&#8217;t restrict yourself to just answering the question asked: take the opportunity to digress a little.  Conciseness is good, but instead of just a one-sentence answer, I think you could have given a two-sentence answer.  In other words, after question you got asked, I think you could have given the one- or two-sentence answer you gave, then tack on one more sentence or two with a fun anecdote.  Tell a little story, or give an example of the general point you just made, or say something about why your methods are meaningful to your kids or to you.  It&#8217;s OK to use the interviewer&#8217;s question as just a jumping-off point: to answer the question, then bridge/segue to some related topic that you&#8217;re enthusiastic about.  You can prepare before the interview some little stories or neat examples from your class, and have a few of them ready in your head, so that you can sprinkle them into the conversation.</p>
<p>By the way, if it makes you feel any better, I have exactly the same shortcoming: I&#8217;ve given live interviews on national TV, and I fell into the same pattern.  I think it is for a few reasons: (a) I&#8217;m a geeky mathematician, and I&#8217;m trained to answer exactly the question asked, as precisely as possible, which means my instinct is to avoid any digression (which is not necessarily the right instinct here), (b) I&#8217;m super-aware that I have only a tiny time slot, and so I&#8217;m trying to be as concise as possible, (c) I find the experience totally stressful, and I don&#8217;t think or articulate well on my feet under time pressure.  I don&#8217;t know whether any of that applies to you as well, but I mention in case it resonates.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think did a good job.  Please don&#8217;t take any of this as criticism: I enjoyed your interview, and thought you came off very well!  It&#8217;s great to see you get some exposure and recognition for your excellent work, and I hope it exposes more folks to the thought-provoking ideas on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michelle		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with Kris about thinking about math in a new way. 
I have an idea for a math problem, or unit, but I&#039;m not sure how to do it, mostly because I have to review the Stats course I just took because I had to. 

The TED talk on penguins? Can that be made mathematical, like having students research or take info on the penguins and measure it, graph it, make statistical measurements on things like how many penguins die per year, etc.?  Can it be made into some kind of algebraic formula, equation, or study?

This would be interesting to do, also bringing reading into math by having the students research the career that leads to someone doing decades long studies on penguins on an island - where does the money come from? What groups are interested? What college major is it? etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Kris about thinking about math in a new way.<br />
I have an idea for a math problem, or unit, but I&#8217;m not sure how to do it, mostly because I have to review the Stats course I just took because I had to. </p>
<p>The TED talk on penguins? Can that be made mathematical, like having students research or take info on the penguins and measure it, graph it, make statistical measurements on things like how many penguins die per year, etc.?  Can it be made into some kind of algebraic formula, equation, or study?</p>
<p>This would be interesting to do, also bringing reading into math by having the students research the career that leads to someone doing decades long studies on penguins on an island &#8211; where does the money come from? What groups are interested? What college major is it? etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Megan		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260664</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Megan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260664</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bringing in sex was a bit bold on your part. Astute and relevant, but bold. I don&#039;t think they&#039;ll be inviting you on FOX any time soon.

Kudos friend. I&#039;ll watch cable news if you&#039;re on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bringing in sex was a bit bold on your part. Astute and relevant, but bold. I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll be inviting you on FOX any time soon.</p>
<p>Kudos friend. I&#8217;ll watch cable news if you&#8217;re on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dina		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The tie messed me up, Dan. I couldn&#039;t concentrate on anything you said. ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tie messed me up, Dan. I couldn&#8217;t concentrate on anything you said. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kris Kramer		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260642</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris Kramer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well done.  Love the graphing example; you&#039;ve got me thinking about math if a whole new way!  Saw a woman with super-high wedge heels the other day.  My first thought was to take a picture in order to discuss angles :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done.  Love the graphing example; you&#8217;ve got me thinking about math if a whole new way!  Saw a woman with super-high wedge heels the other day.  My first thought was to take a picture in order to discuss angles :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Buell		</title>
		<link>/2010/hello-cnn/#comment-260634</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Buell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 07:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6827#comment-260634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the vid. You did great. CNN? I dunno. The canned footage of a kid going through a math folder was pretty strange. They probably could have just pulled some vid off of this site if they&#039;re looking for something else to show.


And the backdrop? Where do you teach? &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405325/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sky High Academy?&lt;/A&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the vid. You did great. CNN? I dunno. The canned footage of a kid going through a math folder was pretty strange. They probably could have just pulled some vid off of this site if they&#8217;re looking for something else to show.</p>
<p>And the backdrop? Where do you teach? <a HREF="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405325/" rel="nofollow">Sky High Academy?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
