<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Nick Hershman&#8217;s Follow Up: Will It Hit The Corner	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2010/nick-hershmans-follow-up-will-it-hit-the-corner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2010/nick-hershmans-follow-up-will-it-hit-the-corner/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick		</title>
		<link>/2010/nick-hershmans-follow-up-will-it-hit-the-corner/#comment-255093</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6007#comment-255093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought it&#039;d be great to try after watching some of the videos that Kate Nowak had posted on her geometry class blog. She also posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://function-of-time.blogspot.com/2010/01/mid-stream-course-changes.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;student feedback along with her reflections&lt;/a&gt;. Video lessons are not simply extensions of class time. They don&#039;t allow students to acquire content and ideas as easily as in the classroom. Kate put it better.

I&#039;ve only tried video homework in a few cases and usually found that it didn&#039;t compare to a few minutes of class time and some individual attention. At least for my middle school 7th and 8th graders. I also have worked with advanced students in 7th grade who took entirely online courses and acquired all the content through the types of videos we&#039;re talking about. I think the kids who soak up the info are much more rare than the kids who don&#039;t use the internet as a learning tool, in Kate&#039;s words

&quot;They still really, really think the Internet is for cute kittens and flirting with their gender of preference, and they would rather see a live Dramatic Performance by their classroom teacher.&quot;

In general, I have yet to see good evidence to the contrary. Maybe the videos require some extra layers of teaching and guidance to get students learning from them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it&#8217;d be great to try after watching some of the videos that Kate Nowak had posted on her geometry class blog. She also posted <a href="http://function-of-time.blogspot.com/2010/01/mid-stream-course-changes.html" rel="nofollow">student feedback along with her reflections</a>. Video lessons are not simply extensions of class time. They don&#8217;t allow students to acquire content and ideas as easily as in the classroom. Kate put it better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only tried video homework in a few cases and usually found that it didn&#8217;t compare to a few minutes of class time and some individual attention. At least for my middle school 7th and 8th graders. I also have worked with advanced students in 7th grade who took entirely online courses and acquired all the content through the types of videos we&#8217;re talking about. I think the kids who soak up the info are much more rare than the kids who don&#8217;t use the internet as a learning tool, in Kate&#8217;s words</p>
<p>&#8220;They still really, really think the Internet is for cute kittens and flirting with their gender of preference, and they would rather see a live Dramatic Performance by their classroom teacher.&#8221;</p>
<p>In general, I have yet to see good evidence to the contrary. Maybe the videos require some extra layers of teaching and guidance to get students learning from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Meyer		</title>
		<link>/2010/nick-hershmans-follow-up-will-it-hit-the-corner/#comment-255092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6007#comment-255092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Monika&lt;/strong&gt;, I like the idea. There are some spectacular successes and spectacular failures in its execution. Personally, I would like to see a larger body of evidence and a more coherent strategy before I committed, but the upside is obvious to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Monika</strong>, I like the idea. There are some spectacular successes and spectacular failures in its execution. Personally, I would like to see a larger body of evidence and a more coherent strategy before I committed, but the upside is obvious to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: monika hardy		</title>
		<link>/2010/nick-hershmans-follow-up-will-it-hit-the-corner/#comment-255055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monika hardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6007#comment-255055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[nice Nick. I left you a note on your youtube site as well... wondering what age kids you have,... what classes...

This is a side note (from will it hit the corner) but I think it&#039;s something that will allow for more dy/danism-inquisitory-fun in the classroom. And once set, encourages more self-automation on the kids part.. less help on the teacher&#039;s part.

Nick has some videos on youtube ie: how to solve systems... 
I have some collected via voicethread and jing... for the boxed math.. the standardized stuff...
Brightstorm, MIT, other places with free how to videos.

I think if we pooled these for each math topic, and had them available to kids per our class sites... the fixed content could happen in a more individualistic time frame freeing up &quot;together in a room time&quot; for kool beans thinking/questioning/solving...
I know the standardized curriculum often gets in the way of the beauty/fun/reality of math... we think mostly because pace for learning it is so individual.

Here&#039;s an example of what we did this year for alg 2 
http://screencast.com/t/NzFmNTlmNGQt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice Nick. I left you a note on your youtube site as well&#8230; wondering what age kids you have,&#8230; what classes&#8230;</p>
<p>This is a side note (from will it hit the corner) but I think it&#8217;s something that will allow for more dy/danism-inquisitory-fun in the classroom. And once set, encourages more self-automation on the kids part.. less help on the teacher&#8217;s part.</p>
<p>Nick has some videos on youtube ie: how to solve systems&#8230;<br />
I have some collected via voicethread and jing&#8230; for the boxed math.. the standardized stuff&#8230;<br />
Brightstorm, MIT, other places with free how to videos.</p>
<p>I think if we pooled these for each math topic, and had them available to kids per our class sites&#8230; the fixed content could happen in a more individualistic time frame freeing up &#8220;together in a room time&#8221; for kool beans thinking/questioning/solving&#8230;<br />
I know the standardized curriculum often gets in the way of the beauty/fun/reality of math&#8230; we think mostly because pace for learning it is so individual.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example of what we did this year for alg 2<br />
<a href="http://screencast.com/t/NzFmNTlmNGQt" rel="nofollow ugc">http://screencast.com/t/NzFmNTlmNGQt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
