<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pro Tip	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/pro-tip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2011/pro-tip/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 05:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerrid Kruse		</title>
		<link>/2011/pro-tip/#comment-275747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerrid Kruse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 05:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9149#comment-275747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the repeated comments, but I found this reference that will be up your alley for representational types:

Olson, J.K. (2008). The Science Representation Continium. Science and Children, 46 (1), 52-55.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the repeated comments, but I found this reference that will be up your alley for representational types:</p>
<p>Olson, J.K. (2008). The Science Representation Continium. Science and Children, 46 (1), 52-55.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Meyer		</title>
		<link>/2011/pro-tip/#comment-275674</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9149#comment-275674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Obliged, y&#039;all, for contributing the first few citations to my lit review.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obliged, y&#8217;all, for contributing the first few citations to my lit review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerrid Kruse		</title>
		<link>/2011/pro-tip/#comment-275671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerrid Kruse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9149#comment-275671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by no means am I an &quot;expert&quot;, but i dabble in this area of representation as it relates to teaching teachers to teach science.  Here is an editorial i wrote that might get you started.  I cite both Willingham and Olson:

http://ists.pls.uni.edu/istj/issues/36/2_spring_09/editorial.pdf]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by no means am I an &#8220;expert&#8221;, but i dabble in this area of representation as it relates to teaching teachers to teach science.  Here is an editorial i wrote that might get you started.  I cite both Willingham and Olson:</p>
<p><a href="http://ists.pls.uni.edu/istj/issues/36/2_spring_09/editorial.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://ists.pls.uni.edu/istj/issues/36/2_spring_09/editorial.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerrid Kruse		</title>
		<link>/2011/pro-tip/#comment-275668</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerrid Kruse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9149#comment-275668</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You might want to do some research on developmental learning theory.  Also, seek out some articles by Dan Willingham, Joanne Olson and myself about representation types.  This might be a hole in the math ed research, but not the greater education literature.  That said, finding your niche is key to success in academia!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to do some research on developmental learning theory.  Also, seek out some articles by Dan Willingham, Joanne Olson and myself about representation types.  This might be a hole in the math ed research, but not the greater education literature.  That said, finding your niche is key to success in academia!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt W.		</title>
		<link>/2011/pro-tip/#comment-275426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9149#comment-275426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You might be interested in contributing to Richard Lesh&#039;s work on mathematical modeling.  He and an expanding group of  colleagues have done a lot of excellent work in this area.  Beyond Constructivsm (with Helen Doerr) outlines his key ideas and provides several sample problems.  

In a nutshell:
&quot;One of the most significant characteristics that make model-eliciting activities different than most traditional textbook word problems is that, for the latter, the main thing that&#039;s problematic (beyond difficulties associated with computational skills that such problems generally emphasize) is that students must make meaning out of a symbolically described situation.  Whereas, for model-eliciting activities, what&#039;s most problematic is that students must make productive symbolic descriptions of meaningful situations.&quot;
(from article @ www.arp.sprnet.org/curric/Dept_Chairs/math_conceptual_learning.pdf; also includes a number of sample problems)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested in contributing to Richard Lesh&#8217;s work on mathematical modeling.  He and an expanding group of  colleagues have done a lot of excellent work in this area.  Beyond Constructivsm (with Helen Doerr) outlines his key ideas and provides several sample problems.  </p>
<p>In a nutshell:<br />
&#8220;One of the most significant characteristics that make model-eliciting activities different than most traditional textbook word problems is that, for the latter, the main thing that&#8217;s problematic (beyond difficulties associated with computational skills that such problems generally emphasize) is that students must make meaning out of a symbolically described situation.  Whereas, for model-eliciting activities, what&#8217;s most problematic is that students must make productive symbolic descriptions of meaningful situations.&#8221;<br />
(from article @ <a href="http://www.arp.sprnet.org/curric/Dept_Chairs/math_conceptual_learning.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.arp.sprnet.org/curric/Dept_Chairs/math_conceptual_learning.pdf</a>; also includes a number of sample problems)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Cox		</title>
		<link>/2011/pro-tip/#comment-275353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9149#comment-275353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmm.  Blind spot in research, huh?  Better sign up for that one before someone jumps on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  Blind spot in research, huh?  Better sign up for that one before someone jumps on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
