<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The NRICH Approach To Probability	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2013/the-nrich-approach-to-probability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2013/the-nrich-approach-to-probability/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alison		</title>
		<link>/2013/the-nrich-approach-to-probability/#comment-780948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=16515#comment-780948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your kind words about NRICH! The probability stuff had its formal launch yesterday and can be found http://nrich.maths.org/probability. There are a couple of interactive apps with the problems, and more in the offing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your kind words about NRICH! The probability stuff had its formal launch yesterday and can be found <a href="http://nrich.maths.org/probability" rel="nofollow ugc">http://nrich.maths.org/probability</a>. There are a couple of interactive apps with the problems, and more in the offing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian		</title>
		<link>/2013/the-nrich-approach-to-probability/#comment-760568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=16515#comment-760568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NRICH is great. Just like Swan&#039;s stuff. Bowland. Freudenthal. That&#039;s why I think EU and US should collaborate more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NRICH is great. Just like Swan&#8217;s stuff. Bowland. Freudenthal. That&#8217;s why I think EU and US should collaborate more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Becky		</title>
		<link>/2013/the-nrich-approach-to-probability/#comment-756102</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Becky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=16515#comment-756102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was lucky enough to be taught by one of the founders of NRICH whilst at Uni in Cambridge  and I use NRICH resources a lot in my teaching (and constantly recommend them to colleagues!) 

Very much looking forward to coming to see your talk next week Dan!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was lucky enough to be taught by one of the founders of NRICH whilst at Uni in Cambridge  and I use NRICH resources a lot in my teaching (and constantly recommend them to colleagues!) </p>
<p>Very much looking forward to coming to see your talk next week Dan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
