<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Personalized Learning Software: Fun Like Choosing Your Own Ad Experience	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2014/personalized-learning-software-fun-like-choosing-your-own-ad-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2014/personalized-learning-software-fun-like-choosing-your-own-ad-experience/</link>
	<description>less helpful</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 03:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The History of &#34;Personalization&#34; and Teaching Machines &#124; Articleroster.com		</title>
		<link>/2014/personalized-learning-software-fun-like-choosing-your-own-ad-experience/#comment-2109377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The History of &#34;Personalization&#34; and Teaching Machines &#124; Articleroster.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 03:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=20671#comment-2109377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Dan Meyer, “Personalized Learning Software: Fun Like Choosing Your Own Ad Experience” [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dan Meyer, “Personalized Learning Software: Fun Like Choosing Your Own Ad Experience” [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin Hall		</title>
		<link>/2014/personalized-learning-software-fun-like-choosing-your-own-ad-experience/#comment-2045989</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 02:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=20671#comment-2045989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Dan, I&#039;m reading Why Students Don&#039;t Like School right now.  I&#039;d love to read a post describing your reactions sometime.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan, I&#8217;m reading Why Students Don&#8217;t Like School right now.  I&#8217;d love to read a post describing your reactions sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Virginia		</title>
		<link>/2014/personalized-learning-software-fun-like-choosing-your-own-ad-experience/#comment-2038321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Virginia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=20671#comment-2038321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Dan,
I&#039;ve been reading all your last posts about personalized learning from a foreigner point of view, and I think all of you (advocate or detractor)  are right and wrong at the same time:

- right in your eternal seek of the ideal method of teaching (this is the only way we can improve ourselves&#039;s method)

- wrong in the point that all of you seem to think there is &quot;one&quot; ideal method of teaching.

From my modest point of view, I bet that the combination of all of existing methods is the best one, because this way you&#039;ll arrive to all kind of students, whatever their learning proccesses are.

Use of thechnologies? Yes!! Personalized learning of some contents? Again, yes!! Use of &quot;touchable&quot; materials? Yes, of course! Structured discussions? Yes! Experimental learning of maths in the lab through chemical practises? Why not?

Maybe the difficult task for us now is to find a perfect equilibrium for the usage of all these methods....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dan,<br />
I&#8217;ve been reading all your last posts about personalized learning from a foreigner point of view, and I think all of you (advocate or detractor)  are right and wrong at the same time:</p>
<p>&#8211; right in your eternal seek of the ideal method of teaching (this is the only way we can improve ourselves&#8217;s method)</p>
<p>&#8211; wrong in the point that all of you seem to think there is &#8220;one&#8221; ideal method of teaching.</p>
<p>From my modest point of view, I bet that the combination of all of existing methods is the best one, because this way you&#8217;ll arrive to all kind of students, whatever their learning proccesses are.</p>
<p>Use of thechnologies? Yes!! Personalized learning of some contents? Again, yes!! Use of &#8220;touchable&#8221; materials? Yes, of course! Structured discussions? Yes! Experimental learning of maths in the lab through chemical practises? Why not?</p>
<p>Maybe the difficult task for us now is to find a perfect equilibrium for the usage of all these methods&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
