Dan Meyer

Total 1628 Posts
I'm Dan and this is my blog. I'm a former high school math teacher and current head of teaching at Desmos. He / him. More here.

Dear Technology Coordinators:

Scott’s bold-faced question is: “Why aren’t our school organizations expecting more of their employees?” By “more” he means “tech use,” which he illustrates by comparing teachers to architects, stockbrokers, and grocery checkers:

For example, a grocery store checker doesn’t get to say ‘No thanks, I don’t think I’ll use a register.’ A stockbroker doesn’t get to say, ‘No thanks, I don’t think I’ll use a computer.’ An architect doesn’t get to say, ‘No thanks, I don’t think I’ll use AutoCAD.’ But in education, we plead and implore and incentivize but we never seem to require.

The difference, without sharpening my point too finely, is that the effect of technology on instruction is highly variable, while its effect on those other jobs is not.

Consider the vast, comical difference between a) an architect who uses computer-assisted drafting software and one who drafts by hand, b) a checker who uses a register and one who tracks purchases with a pencil, and c) a broker who relies on Bloomberg’s stock monitoring software and one who uses a ticker tape machine.

Then consider the difference between a teacher who uses blogs, wikis, podcasts, vodcasts, VoiceThread, Operator11, SlideShare, TeacherTube, Flickr, Animoto, and one who doesn’t. The difference between the two is less obvious neither is it necessarily positive. When used improperly and uncreatively, these tools do more harm than goodcf. One high profile flop; 99% of PowerPoint presentations..

If the difference between the converted and unwashed teachers were that obvious, that is, if these tools maximized student engagement while minimizing time wasted right out of the boxcf. Important Ratio #1. (as they do for architects, stockbrokers, and checkers) I’d find Scott’s question a little more pressing and a little less riddled by assumption.

But schools employ technology coordinators (a position unlike any that exist in architecture, stock brokerage, or grocery) to validate those assumptions, to prove and re-prove the opportunities which exist when teachers use these tools well.

If technology coordinators believe that salesmanship is beneath their job description, if they presume that teachers should leap hungrily at their technology before they’ll step in and set up a wiki, then they will doubtlessly find their philosophy reflected back at them in the cynicism and disinterest of their facultyNot that I’m expecting a show of hands, but I’m curious how many tech coordinators approach their job with this pocketful of presumptions. I’m at a disadvantage here as the only tech coordinators I read (Kim, Patrick, and Ken, plus Scott with his sporadic tech evangelism scripts) seem tireless in their pursuit of their colleagues..

Selling tech to the teacher is the tech coordinator’s job just like selling learning to the student is the teacher’s. Anyone who thinks he’s in a seller’s market here deludes himself. Anyone who thinks that punitive measures for the buyer will solve his market crisis (cf. John Gross’ comment at Scott’s) is even more deluded.

My Annual Report

Here’s a pdf. Also each image below is very clickable.

I reckon I could drop a few thousand words on either end of the process – either the introspective or the technical – and I probably won’t resist too much in the days to come. Suffice it to say right now, though, that both ends were a lot more challenging and a lot more satisfying than anything I’ve done with design in a long time.

Let’s see your years.

You Just Put Your Lips Together

Regarding this new contest, Ken writes:

What if I’m all ‘thinking about design’, but saddled with an inability to convert thought to creation?

Mr. K replies with the implicit mantra of this contest and of my Information Design course:

Don’t do it to win – do it to do it. I suspect the problem isn’t whether you can do it at all, but whether you can do it well enough that you’d feel comfortable showing it to anyone else (much less the world). You’re not going to get to that point if you don’t take the first step.

So throw the data into excel. Have it draw a graph. Decide what you hate about the graph, and fix that. Already you’ll be ahead of 80% of the data presenters out there.

A few founts of information, if it helps get this process moving for you:

Contest: Your Annual Report

[Update: the final contestants & the winners]

The judges are pleased to bring you this blog’s second design contest. May you find this assignment, first and foremost, an opportunity for reflection and self-diagnosis at the end of 2007. The prizes and competition are secondary and incidental. They exist only to push forward the amateur designer who seems most inclined towards professional design.

Instructions

  1. Design information in four ways to represent 2007 as you experienced it. This can mean:
    • four separate PowerPoint slides with one design apiece,
    • one JPEG with four designs gridded onto it,
    • an Excel spreadsheet inset with four charts,
    • etc.

    Feel free to use pies, bars, dots, bubbles, sparklines, stacks, or designs of your own construction.

  2. Submit your designs. Either:
  3. Post your reflections either:
    • in the comments here, or
    • at your own blog.

Illustrative Examples

  1. This slide, representing my music intake over 2007, comprises two designs, a bar chart and an ordered list:
  2. This page, representing Nicholas Felton’s travel habits in 2005, comprises four designs.

Deadline

  • Sunday, January 13, 23h59, Pacific Standard Time

Judges

Prize

Legal

  • You own your slides, though we’ll post them here (attributed) and, in all likelihood, pick several apart.

How We Got Here

  1. The 2006 Feltron Annual Report, Nicholas Felton
  2. The 2005 Feltron Annual Report, Nicholas Felton
  3. Who Is Nicholas Felton?, Dan Meyer
  4. Information Design: Syllabus, Dan Meyer
  5. The New Division of Labor, Levy and Murnane
  6. The contest organizer’s raving conviction that assignments like these will be essential to math and language education in the 21st century.
  7. The contest organizer’s nagging suspicion that, in ten years time, his raving conviction will look either eerily prescient or (more likely) totally obvious.