In addition to sturdy entries by Alice Mercer and Tom Woodward, we now have:

Friedrich Knauss

Nick Pernisco

Graham Wegner

We still await entries from:

Diane, Dave, Colette, John, Chris, Nancy, Glenn, Kevin, Tracy, Jeffrey, H, and Neil.

Alright, with a week remaining, it’s a two-party fight between Alice Mercer:

and Tom Woodward:

The turnout confirms what I suspected going in: this design challenge is prohibitively challenging. Colossal TA Katy awaits your submissions nevertheless.

Here’s a pdf. Also each image below is very clickable.

I reckon I could drop a few thousand words on either end of the process – either the introspective or the technical – and I probably won’t resist too much in the days to come. Suffice it to say right now, though, that both ends were a lot more challenging and a lot more satisfying than anything I’ve done with design in a long time.

Let’s see your years.

Regarding this new contest, Ken writes:

What if I’m all ‘thinking about design’, but saddled with an inability to convert thought to creation?

Mr. K replies with the implicit mantra of this contest and of my Information Design course:

Don’t do it to win – do it to do it. I suspect the problem isn’t whether you can do it at all, but whether you can do it well enough that you’d feel comfortable showing it to anyone else (much less the world). You’re not going to get to that point if you don’t take the first step.

So throw the data into excel. Have it draw a graph. Decide what you hate about the graph, and fix that. Already you’ll be ahead of 80% of the data presenters out there.

A few founts of information, if it helps get this process moving for you:

• events recorded in your calendar,
• blog statistics,
• last.fm / iTunes statistics,
• credit card / bank statements,
• cell phone records,
• cocomment / commentful / co.mments statistics,
• TwitterStats
• Google Reader trends.

[Update: the final contestants & the winners]

The judges are pleased to bring you this blog’s second design contest. May you find this assignment, first and foremost, an opportunity for reflection and self-diagnosis at the end of 2007. The prizes and competition are secondary and incidental. They exist only to push forward the amateur designer who seems most inclined towards professional design.

Instructions

1. Design information in four ways to represent 2007 as you experienced it. This can mean:
   • four separate PowerPoint slides with one design apiece,
   • one JPEG with four designs gridded onto it,
   • an Excel spreadsheet inset with four charts,
   • etc.

   Feel free to use pies, bars, dots, bubbles, sparklines, stacks, or designs of your own construction.

2. Submit your designs. Either:
   • post them to your blog and e-mail me a link, or
   • e-mail them to me as an attachment.
3. Post your reflections either:
   • in the comments here, or
   • at your own blog.

Illustrative Examples

1. This slide, representing my music intake over 2007, comprises two designs, a bar chart and an ordered list:
   
2. This page, representing Nicholas Felton’s travel habits in 2005, comprises four designs.
   

Deadline

• Sunday, January 13, 23h59, Pacific Standard Time

Judges

• Ethan Bodnar (EthanBodnar.com and dy/dan design contest co-champ)
• Nicholas Felton (Feltron Eight and Megafone)
• Christian Long (think:lab)
• Scott McLeod (Dangerously Irrelevant)
• Dan Meyer (dy/dan)
• Paul Williams (Neu Thinking and dy/dan design contest co-champ)

Prize

• A subscription to rockin’ good design periodical Before & After magazine.

Legal

• You own your slides, though we’ll post them here (attributed) and, in all likelihood, pick several apart.

How We Got Here

1. The 2006 Feltron Annual Report, Nicholas Felton
2. The 2005 Feltron Annual Report, Nicholas Felton
3. Who Is Nicholas Felton?, Dan Meyer
4. Information Design: Syllabus, Dan Meyer
5. The New Division of Labor, Levy and Murnane
6. The contest organizer’s raving conviction that assignments like these will be essential to math and language education in the 21^st century.
7. The contest organizer’s nagging suspicion that, in ten years time, his raving conviction will look either eerily prescient or (more likely) totally obvious.