Tracy W, on making sure your stick/carrot is really a stick/carrot:
The [student] gets to define what is a positive reinforcer and what is a negative reinforcer, not the [teacher].
Lots more where that came from in the most recent episode preview.
Tracy W, on making sure your stick/carrot is really a stick/carrot:
The [student] gets to define what is a positive reinforcer and what is a negative reinforcer, not the [teacher].
Lots more where that came from in the most recent episode preview.
Your own husbands and wives don’t know you as well as Jeff knows me:
You’re just shaking the bee’s nest while covered in powdered sugar, a big ol’ grin on your face and your buddy taping the whole thing for some sort of amateur Jackass production.
That’s basically it.
Awhile back, a new teacher e-mailed me:
I’m tired of watching math taught the way math is taught at my school – review last night’s homework, give notes, start that night’s homework. I want to do things differently but I don’t know how.
I’m not gonna pretend my kids wouldn’t rather be at Seabright than taking my class, but year-for-year my attendance has never been higher. For the first time since getting into this, I get kids mad at me for calling in a sub. Like they prefer the class with me in it than without.
Here, reformatted a bit for blog output, is my reply:
Such a huge question, [redacted]. Let’s see where ten minutes of typing takes us.
Kids today, I think, find the typical classroom pace too slow. Teacher writes something on the board. Kid writes it down. They talk about it. Two years ago I chopped that time in half using a digital projector and Keynote to type my notes in advance of the class. I gesture. I talk about whatever they see on the board but they don’t have to wait for me.
Transitions take too long. Teachers burn a few minutes here and there passing out worksheets or getting kids started into an opener or allowing them to line up at the door early.
Basically I think the first step to creating a classroom that kids look forward to is to reclaim any minutes you possibly can through good planning and good classroom management.
After that you pave the way for a lot of miscellaneous fun. For example, if you run a warmup, toss an interesting question onto the end that’s unrelated to math. They’ll look forward to it. It’ll show ’em that their teacher cares about stuff they’re interested in or at least that she doesn’t just care exclusively about stuff they aren’t interested in (ie. math). I’ve attached a list of questions I use in class, most of which were lifted from a book called Vital Statistics which I wholeheartedly recommend
Don’t ask. .After you salt those throughout your class routine, you start making the math more engaging. Ask yourself: if I have a good idea for a mathematical connection or application, can I make a learning experience out of it? If you don’t have a projector, you’re pretty well limited to worksheets and outside artifacts. But from there, walking around with the knowledge that if you had a good idea, you could do something with it, you’ll start getting good ideas from all corners.
I get ’em watching TV a lot. I extract a video clip and make a thirty-minute worksheet out of it. Not ’cause I have any amazing insight or skills but because I’m constantly in teacher mode, looking for interesting things.
So you’ve started tossing small engaging bits along the margins of your classroom and you’ve started making your activities more interesting. Then I really recommend you reconsider how you assign homework and how you assess. In my opinion, the default procedures for homework (1-30 odd) and assessment (large, comprehensive tests every two weeks) are extremely damaging to kids. I have two posts in my most-read sidebar (Why I Don’t Assign Homework & How Math Must Assess) which explain a lot of this.
Brain dump there, [redacted]. Please don’t consider any of this prescriptive or gospel. There are plenty of ways to make a math class that kids hate to miss. These are a few of mine.
Regards,
Dan
Selected responses to my question: what external factors correlate to your teaching satisfaction? (Or dis-, as was my particular situation.)
For example, if I’ve had a good day, I’ll listen to Gordon Goodwin, Dr. Demento, classic rock or Richard Nixon’s speeches. If I’ve had a bad day, I’ll listen to Sammy Davis, Jr., Cake, The Decemberists or Alexi Murdoch.
I think I got a negative correlation thing going. The rougher things get, the more virtual ink gets spilled.
The worse the day, the longer I need to debrief and the more likely I am to call a friend to distract me from planning the next day.
And the great thing is it’s a leading indicator by about six months; if I’m reducing my hours at home, I can know that my job satisfaction is going to be in the gutter in half-a-year—plenty of time to fix it now that I recognize the indicator and look for it.
If I’m joking in the math workroom or with kids in the hall or after school, things are going well. If they aren’t going as well as I’d like, I’m brooding.
And now I will drown some kittens. Excuse me.
Jason, one of the Animoto guys, responds to my criticism, admitting his utility’s limitations as a storytelling medium
… the Animoto presentation is in a style that many students are familiar with (MTV-style videos), I think it adds a great juxtaposition of using an aesthetic with which kids are already familiar, along with learning material than [sic] they are being exposed to for the first time.
Animoto is a staggeringly cool tool which almost everyone – even its creators, off Jason’s comment – appreciates for the wrong reason.
Specifically, Animoto creates photo montages better and faster than any other Internet utility but, over the long run, the fact that the montages jitter and bob with the music – its most celebrated and distinctive feature – does nothing for me as a media consumer and less than nothing for me as a educator
This isn’t because I like taking shots at the high-flying School 2.0 balloon or even because this is a matter of opinion. It isn’t. Nor do I take some old-fashioned exception to the MTV aesthetic.
But the MTV aesthetic, even at its most arresting, spasmodic, and hypnotizingly awful, gives content some consideration
Its z-axis transitions look great but they are selected wholly apart from your content and, several times per slideshow, they obscure it – cropping out your Auntie’s face and strobing several shots over the rest of your family – simply because Animoto doesn’t know any better
“No two videos are the same,” claims Animoto’s main page but each slideshow shares in common a complete, 100%, de facto disregard for the relationship between form and content. Maybe it’s unfair of me to suggest that educators oughtta know better but I’m astonished that this same crowd which dumped all over MTV in the ’90s has missed this, that it has endorsed a tool good only for spackling enthusiasm across a crowd as meaningful learning, as meaningful assessment, as meaningful self-expression.
If you’re going to teach this at all, you owe your kids to teach it right. Yet my colleagues’ enthusiasm for visual expression has outpaced their understanding of it by several orders of magnitude.
What efforts are you making to get this right?