Year: 2010

Total 151 Posts

Is This What Lemov Means By “No Opt-Out?”

Someone, if not Lemov, ought to film this exchange. David Cox takes a student from “I have no idea.” to “Oh that’s how you do it.” without asking a single content question, just a series of Jedi meta-cognitive mind tricks that amount, basically, to this:

  1. What is the question asking you to do?
  2. What do you know about what it’s asking you to do?
  3. Do you notice any patterns about what you know about what it’s asking you to do?
  4. How can you use that pattern about what you know about what it’s asking you to do to answer the question?

Yo Dave: record that patter to MP3; sync to every portable music device in the classroom; take the day off.

BTW: Tom Woodward pulls a clip out of his vault that illustrates, if not this exact line of questioning, its tone.

My comment there:

If “feign the curiosity of a novice” isn’t an element of Lemov’s Taxonomy, he needs to get started on the second edition pronto. I think it’s a very small subset of educators who attempt this kind of assessment at all (ie. “waitaminit … walk me through this … “) and an even smaller subset of those educators who can pull it off without it seeming campy or in on their own joke.

What Can You Do With This: Gimme Friction / Taberinos

Teaser

Open class with an online game, either Gimme Friction or Taberinos. Play for ten minutes. Have your students write down their highest scores. Create a classroom leaderboard.

What can you do with this now?

Spoiler

I’ll try to limit myself to broad strokes here. There are a lot of interesting trees but the forest — the framework for turning an interesting thing into a challenging thing — is what interests me most.

1. Freeze gameplay in time and space.

2. Ask the students to make an intuitive prediction about where the ball will hit the ceiling.

3. Show them the answer.

4. Formalize the math.

You can print out the previous picture and pass it around. Have students measure everything. Measuring things is a useful thing to do when you don’t know what to do.

Don’t just tell them to measure the angles. “Measure the angles,” is too helpful. Who will narrow down the scope of a problem like that for them after they graduate?

Eventually reach the (useful) conclusion that in a frictionless system like this, the incoming angle equals the outgoing angle.

5. Practice

Screengrab a few more scenarios like #1 above and have them determine where the ball will end up. Ideally, you’ll have the answer videos queued up so that the question of correctness isn’t answered by the authority figure in the room, rather by the world itself.

6. Play the game again.

Are scores higher or lower? Does an appreciation of the math undergirding the game even matter? Does it matter if it matters?

7. Iterate

Gimme Friction beats out Taberinos and the usual miniature golf-style application of this concept because, eventually, you’re firing cannon ballsTeaching has made me an expert in certain skills that are marketable nowhere outside of teaching. You know what I’m talking about. In this case, I reflexively attach an adjective to the word “balls.” Basket balls. Tennis balls. Cannon balls. Every time. You will never catch me saying “balls” without modification by an adjective. I wish I was this good at anything else in my life because this won’t impress anybody at my ten-year high school reunion. off of curved surfaces, and then, without even really trying, you’re talking about tangent lines.

8. More practice.

Good questions here include:

“Is it possible to hit all three targets?”

“What cannon angles are ‘safe’?”

9. Extensions

Can you imagine the exceptional grasp of coordinate geometry, trigonometry, and vector math it took to program this game? We haven’t even gone into the way the cannon ball slides to a stop and then expands until it reaches a boundary.

So lay a coordinate grid over a screenshot. The only variable here is the angle of the cannon. If a student could develop an algorithm to describe the final position and size of the first shot fired for every angle from -90° to 90°, I’d assign her an A for the first semester of Trigonometry, no hesitation.

Nature By Numbers

I’m usually pretty immune to this sort of thing. I don’t want to dazzle my students with math. I want them to engage with math and sometimes the spectacle just intimidates them or makes math seem all the more foreign and unknowable.

Other times the spectacle is simply too spectacular not to share.

This Is Why We Can’t Assign Nice Things

Fresh off our success decoding airline flight tables, I promised them we were going to crack the secrets of grocery stores wide open but to do so we’d need a lot of data. If we each sampled three data points, that’d suffice.

I gave them the weekend. I gave them a week’s worth of homework credit. I let them work with a partner.

33% of the class submitted data. That’s a pity. Even worse is the difference between the data I personally gathered last September (blue diamonds) and the noise my students submitted (pink squares) some of which was almost laughably fabricated. (As in, I laughed when I saw it.)

For perspective, I have one really exceptional outlier out of the thirty-six transactions I recorded: the person who took six minutes to purchase twenty items. It was a disastrous exchange featuring a price check and a ripped register tape. It was so bad that people happily fled that customer’s line for longer ones.

Out of my students’ thirty-two data points, they observed six transactions that were even more abnormal than that one, including one incredible checker who managed to ring up one hundred items in just eighty-one seconds.

Exactly one hundred items, right?