Category: tech contrarianism

Total 133 Posts

A Moonwalking Red Herring

Dina Strasser, responding to skepticism of her earlier skepticism, addresses those who would suggest that classroom tech is a sufficient motivator for students:

While I have witnessed this and agree, I also think that it’s a red herring. A sparkling, glitzy herring in high heels dancing backwards, but a herring all the same. If I scan a page of a vocabulary workbook into the computer, convert it to PDF, and add digital fill in the blanks, my kids may be “motivated” to work on it— but it’s still the same damn workbook that has no basis in effective teaching practice, flexible problem solving, or language acquisition research.

Engaging a classroom on a daily basis requires more than just some superficial adjustment to classroom form. You’ve gotta bring great, diverse content daily and, unfortunately, there exists no tool, no shortcut, nothing else to do the job but the blunt application of profound creativity in the direction of challenging content standards.

This girl is dangerous.

As much as you’d like to believe there are only two crowds here – one crowd of competent ed-technophiles and another of ignorant ed-technophobes – there is a crowd of teachers milling about the faculty lounge that gets this stuff, that enjoys this stuff even, but that needs a sales pitch less emotional and more practical when it comes to classroom integration.

Enter Dina Strasser’s seven skeptical questions, which lays our inner monologues out for everybody else. I swear, if y’all would just read and link and del.icio.us this up, I’d never have to write about my classroom tech reservations again. Hers are that comprehensive.

  1. Does this value-added, teacher-independent learning relate DIRECTLY to my content objectives and standards?

    Sorry. “Universally related” or “indirectly related” just doesn’t cut it–this is the open door for uncritical idolatry. For example, I have never understood the lumbering Godzilla-like argument that because our kids are “digital natives,” we should de facto use tech in school. Why? If using tech is as natural to them as breathing, isn’t this like asking us to teach kids to breathe?

If you’re a tech coordinator, -evangelist or -salesperson, you’d do well to read the rest and realize that, if you can’t sell your particular product [Twitter, Skype, Ustream, whatever] to a tech-savvy teacher who has outlined her every objection in advance, then you will find deaf ears everywhere else as well.

How Animoto Gets Animoto Wrong

Jason, one of the Animoto guys, responds to my criticism, admitting his utility’s limitations as a storytelling mediumwhich, of course, is the box most K-12 educators are forcing Animoto into, even though it makes VoiceThread look awesome. but then noting its “great pedagogical usages,” the most interesting of which is:

… the Animoto presentation is in a style that many students are familiar with (MTV-style videos), I think it adds a great juxtaposition of using an aesthetic with which kids are already familiar, along with learning material than [sic] they are being exposed to for the first time.

Animoto is a staggeringly cool tool which almost everyone – even its creators, off Jason’s comment – appreciates for the wrong reason.

Specifically, Animoto creates photo montages better and faster than any other Internet utility but, over the long run, the fact that the montages jitter and bob with the music – its most celebrated and distinctive feature – does nothing for me as a media consumer and less than nothing for me as a educatorwatch a dozen in a row and let me know how quickly your returns diminish..

This isn’t because I like taking shots at the high-flying School 2.0 balloon or even because this is a matter of opinion. It isn’t. Nor do I take some old-fashioned exception to the MTV aesthetic.

But the MTV aesthetic, even at its most arresting, spasmodic, and hypnotizingly awful, gives content some considerationeg. the lyrics of a dark, dreary song inform the visuals at least a little.. Animoto has no such capability. It will adjust the speed of your video to match your song but it does not care even a little about your photographic content.

Its z-axis transitions look great but they are selected wholly apart from your content and, several times per slideshow, they obscure it – cropping out your Auntie’s face and strobing several shots over the rest of your family – simply because Animoto doesn’t know any bettercf. the Ken Burns effect, which, stale and tired as it is, zooms, pans, and crops photos all to enhance content..

“No two videos are the same,” claims Animoto’s main page but each slideshow shares in common a complete, 100%, de facto disregard for the relationship between form and content. Maybe it’s unfair of me to suggest that educators oughtta know better but I’m astonished that this same crowd which dumped all over MTV in the ’90s has missed this, that it has endorsed a tool good only for spackling enthusiasm across a crowd as meaningful learning, as meaningful assessment, as meaningful self-expression.

If you’re going to teach this at all, you owe your kids to teach it right. Yet my colleagues’ enthusiasm for visual expression has outpaced their understanding of it by several orders of magnitude.

What efforts are you making to get this right?

This Thing I Just Realized:

Teachers : Animoto :: Teenage Boys : Michael Bay

Animoto belongs in the classroom as much as Transformers does in an arthouse.

The masterminds behind both are clearly field-tested and combat-readyCheck out the Animoto intro video, which is a motion-graphic marvel, for proof., but as a storytelling device, as a medium for instruction, as a delivery device for anything but rockin’, noisy thrills, light on content, heavy on flash, their products flatly suck.

Again: if you want to strike an emotional chord with your audience or jazz up your Poughkeepsie vacation slideshow then Animoto’s got you covered.

But all y’all Classroom 2.0 Animoto-philesI only subscribe to their feed ’cause I’m running a heated bet with myself that Sir Ken Robinson’s state of the educational union will get 900 individual mentions (” … hey, has anyone seen this video … “) before school’s out. So far I’m winning.: when has any worthy learning moment come as cheaply and easily as an Animoto slideshow?

  • Upload your photos. [Great interface.]
  • Browse their archives for music. [It automatically embeds the citation.]
  • Uh.
  • Wait?
  • That’s it?

Yeah, I realize it slickly analyzes your music for tempo and adjusts visual rhythm to match but nowhere does it analyze your photos for content. Nowhere does it automate a narrative. Nowhere does AnimotoOr Michael Bay, while we’re here. do anything more than jab your frontal lobe with a sharp, happy stick.

*poke poke poke*

yeah! yeah! yeah!

Not saying there isn’t a place for this, but I am saying it isn’t the classroom. This is decidedly the one-size-fits-all visual essay and if I’ve gotta brainwash your kids when I get ’em from you and reteach ’em the form, it won’t be without posting this cranky missive first.

Unexamined Idolatry

Dina Strasser on Jeff’s voluntary withdrawl of tech from his classroom:

He has the right to refuse ill-supported tech; or obtuse tech; or irrelevant tech; or redundant tech; or tech whose outcomes have not been measured sufficiently enough to warrant its judicious use in a classroom by a thoughtful teacher.

And let me tell you: blogger and Twitterer and 1:1 lab-er and Goggle Doc-er and Webinar-er and Voicethreader and Skyper and nascent info designer though I may be, I’m beginning to suspect that the ed tech world is rife with the stuff enumerated in [the paragraph quoted here]. I’ve never in my life seen a phrase like “but it’s the 21st century” get more unexamined idolatry.