Dan Meyer

Total 1628 Posts
I'm Dan and this is my blog. I'm a former high school math teacher and current head of teaching at Desmos. He / him. More here.

The Correlatives

Selected responses to my question: what external factors correlate to your teaching satisfaction? (Or dis-, as was my particular situation.)

  • Benjamin Baxter: Music

    For example, if I’ve had a good day, I’ll listen to Gordon Goodwin, Dr. Demento, classic rock or Richard Nixon’s speeches. If I’ve had a bad day, I’ll listen to Sammy Davis, Jr., Cake, The Decemberists or Alexi Murdoch.

  • TMAO: Blog Output

    I think I got a negative correlation thing going. The rougher things get, the more virtual ink gets spilled.

  • Sarah Cannon: Time Spent On Phone

    The worse the day, the longer I need to debrief and the more likely I am to call a friend to distract me from planning the next day.

  • Stephen Humphrey: Family Time

    And the great thing is it’s a leading indicator by about six months; if I’m reducing my hours at home, I can know that my job satisfaction is going to be in the gutter in half-a-year—plenty of time to fix it now that I recognize the indicator and look for it.

  • Jackie B: Interpersonal Communication

    If I’m joking in the math workroom or with kids in the hall or after school, things are going well. If they aren’t going as well as I’d like, I’m brooding.

  • Dina Strasser: Unspeakable, Frankly

    And now I will drown some kittens. Excuse me.

A Debt Owed To Pavlov

Let’s say that every day for a semester, as the release bell rings, you say, sincerely, “Bye bye, boys and girls. It was good to see you today.”

Let’s say now that it’s second semester and your students have forgotten just how much math used to bore them not ten months ago. They’re feeling out the edges of classroom norms. They’re challenging behavior expectations a little more casually than they used to.

You may feel inclined to deliver a speech, something about how you brought them your best work today while they brought you much less than that.

But, if you really want to mess with their programming, to issue a sharp, subconscious reality check, simply let the release bell ring without your usual valediction.

The effect is sobering, contemplative, and downright funereal.

Presentations: Before/After

Two edubloggers, Damian Bariexca and Ben Wildeboer, posted classroom presentations within minutes of each other, both having updated them for student engagement and visual prettiness.

Wildeboer:

Bariexca:

[fixed names; thanks, h.]

The Principle Improvement

Their “before” slidedecks are dense with information. Their “before” slidedecks function as effective summaries of their lectures, which is a trait shared by absolutely every lousy slidedeck ever.

Their “after” slidedecks are image-heavy and information-light. They’re simply projecting images – no effects, no animation, no bullets – and, though we can debate the appropriateness of the images and the value they add to the lecture, no longer are Bariexca or Wildeboer trying to corral their entire talk within a 640×480 screen, which is death.

I Pity Them

But I pity these boys. I can predict their descent into madness ’cause I’m living it daily.

First, they’ll grow bored of punching keywords into FlickrCC. They’ll start searching out primary sources: satellite images, images from AP, Reuters, and Google searches.

Then they’ll start noticing extensions to their classroom content in the world around them and start snapping their own photos, creating their own Venn diagrams, building hyper-relevant discussions around those images.

Then these parasites will move to moving pictures, downloading clips from YouTube, from TV shows, building discussions around video.

Then, when they start bumping against that ceiling, they’ll make video content themselves and, from there, they’re properly screwed.

The Critical Question

But why use images at all?

What value does a submerged scuba diver add to Wildeboer’s discussion of the Earth’s crust? What value does a vampiric Hasidic Jew add to Damian’s discussion of anti-SemitismSeriously, wtf??

To some extent, their images merely season lectures which already tasted fine. Now that they’ve pushed past bullet points, it’s time for them find images which entertain and engage.

For My Part

Though I haven’t found the end of this rabbit-hole, I know I wouldn’t be half the teacher without this ability to put any image I want in front of my students.

Like today, discussing similar figures and scale-drawn maps, we hunted the Meyer family treasure across San Francisco’s financial district using some stitched-together Google Maps:

A student came in late and I caught him up by shuffling back through the slidedeck, getting him started, all with a wireless remote, all from his desk.

Afterwards I asked myself, how did this happen before?, and I couldn’t say.

What Correlates?

I want to know: what in your life correlates to job satisfaction?

It wasn’t always this way for me but once blogging became a daily fix, it fed my job satisfaction, which then fed my blogging. It isn’t coincidence, then, that a brief hiatus here corresponds to another of my miserable on-the-ledge moments out thereA moment which, uncharacteristically, I handled outside this forum. You’re welcome..

For better or worse, this dy/dan thing here has become a pretty accurate barometer for how much I enjoy teaching, a realization which leaves me wondering, what correlates for you?

Polls are open.

You Get To Fire A Math Teacher

A little sadism for your Sunday. Benjamin Baxter puts forward two math teachers:

  1. The competent geometry teacher who knows not much more than first-semester calculus, one who has quite a lot of charisma.
  2. The resident whiz who knows his math stuff – whatever that entails – but lacks so much charisma. Think Steven Hawking.

And says, for budgetary reasons, you’ve gotta fire one of them. Any thoughts, toss ’em his way.

For my part, I think it’s obvious. You fire the shorter teacher. Always.

[Update: My response to this somewhat absurd hypothetical will come as a surprise to no one.]